MINOCA encompasses various etiologies and is associated with fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors but higher rates of atypical factors like anxiety, depression, and autoimmune diseases compared to obstructive CAD.
What are the risk factors and associated comorbidities in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)?
MINOCA is associated with a distinct risk factor profile compared to obstructive myocardial infarction, with a higher prevalence of atypical risk factors like anxiety, depression, and autoimmune diseases.
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), despite a lower burden of coronary atherosclerosis, has a non-negligible prognostic impact. The label of MINOCA includes an array of different aetiologies and pathologic conditions, thus the identification of the underlying disease is crucial to patient management. Myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease and MINOCA share only some risk factors and comorbid conditions. While traditional cardiovascular risk factors have a lower prevalence in MINOCA patients, atypical ones-e.g., anxiety, depression, and autoimmune diseases-are much more frequent in this population. Other conditions-e.g., pregnancy, cancer, and anti-cancer therapy-can predispose to or even induce MINOCA through various mechanisms. The evidence of such risk factors for MINOCA is still scarce and contradicting, as no randomised controlled trials exist in this field. In our work, we performed a review of registries, clinical studies, and case reports of MINOCA, in order to summarise the available data and analyse its possibile pathogenic mechanisms.
Merlo et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA). MINOCA encompasses various etiologies and is associated with fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors but higher rates of atypical factors like anxiety, depression, and autoimmune diseases compared to obstructive CAD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: