PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1968Circulation Research465 citations

Compressibility of the Arterial Wall

View Full Paper
TCT E CarewRVRamesh N. VaishnavDPDali J. Patel

Key Result

The greatest volumetric strain in dog thoracic aorta segments subjected to high internal pressure and stretch was 0.00165, indicating that arteries may be considered incompressible for practical purposes.

Structured PICO

P
Population
11 thoracic aorta segments excised from dogs, along with abdominal aorta, carotid, iliac, and pulmonary arteries
I
Intervention
Application of internal pressure and longitudinal stretch greater than in vivo levels
O
Outcome
Volumetric strain (ΔV/V) and bulk modulisurrogate

Arterial walls exhibit minimal volumetric strain under supraphysiological stresses, confirming they can be treated as incompressible for practical biomechanical analyses.

Abstract

The assumption of incompressibility has often been applied to the analysis of arterial-wall elasticity; however, the supporting evidence has been incomplete. The present study was designed to explore this problem in greater depth by accurately measuring the changes in tissue volume associated with large, induced strains on 11 thoracic aorta segments excised from dogs. The radial, circumferential, and longitudinal stresses were measured as the artery was subjected to an internal pressure and longitudinal stretch greater than those in vivo. From these data it was possible to calculate the hydrostatic stress. The associated changes in volume of the aortic wall tissue were measured with a specially designed apparatus. The greatest volumetric strain (ΔV/V) was 0.00165. The bulk moduli obtained by dividing the hydrostatic stresses by the corresponding volume strains averaged 4.44 x 10 6 g/cm 2 . Similar studies were also carried out on the abdominal aorta and the carotid, iliac, and pulmonary arteries. The volumetric strains observed were of the same magnitude. It is concluded that for most practical purposes arteries may be considered incompressible.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carew et al. (1968) studied Arterial wall elasticity (n=11). Internal pressure and longitudinal stretch was evaluated on Changes in tissue volume (volumetric strain) and bulk moduli. The greatest volumetric strain in dog thoracic aorta segments subjected to high internal pressure and stretch was 0.00165, indicating that arteries may be considered incompressible for practical purposes.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0908e4bee8d5ab8a92dc04https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.23.1.61
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Biphasic, Anisotropic Model of the Aortic Wall2000 · 28 citations
  2. 2Mechanical Properties of Arteries in Vivo1960 · 684 citations
  3. 3Two-Dimensional in-Vitro Studies of Femoral Arterial Walls of the Dog1968 · 55 citations
  4. 4Regional arterial stress-strain distributions referenced to the zero-stress state in the rat2002 · 33 citations
  5. 5Arterial Wall Mechanics in Conscious Dogs1995 · 292 citations