Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To what extent do elite narratives about history shape what citizens make of the past? This article focuses on young Russians’ understanding of history and provides insights into the effects of memory politics in authoritarian settings. The research uses original survey data of urban youth and demonstrates that the regime successfully determines what events are considered important. However, conflicts over their interpretation persist, particularly with regard to less emotionally charged signifiers and those to which respondents can relate personally. Given low variation by age, I suggest that we observe a period effect upon historical memory, rather than a generational effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Félix Krawatzek (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: