Key result
VITROS hs-cTnI assay shows comparable performance and strong correlation with ARCHITECT and ELECSYS methods.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the analytical characteristics and clinical results of a new chemiluminescent hs-cTnI assay (VITROS High Sensitivity Troponin I Assay) and compare it with existing hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT methods.
Does the VITROS High Sensitivity Troponin I Assay show comparable analytical performance and clinical results to established hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT methods?
Observational (n=293)
Does the VITROS High Sensitivity Troponin I Assay show comparable analytical performance and clinical results to established hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT methods?
The new VITROS High Sensitivity Troponin I Assay demonstrates analytical performance and clinical correlation comparable to established high-sensitivity troponin assays.
Expands hs-cTnI assay options for labs; leaves open outcome validation before clinical adoption.
BAKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate both analytical characteristics and clinical results of a new chemiluminescent method for the measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), named VITROS ® High Sensitivity Troponin I Assay, using the VITROS® 3600 automated platform. The results found with this new method were compared to those observed with hs-cTnI ARCHITECT and ECLIA hs-cTnT ELECSYS methods. METHODS: For evaluation of analytical performance and comparison of clinical results, plasma samples (lithium-heparin), were collected from apparently healthy subjects and patients with cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS: The hs-cTnI VITROS method showed values for limit of blank (LoB 0.33 ng/L), limit of detection (LoD, 0.91 ng/L), limit of quantifications at 20% (LoQ 20% CV, 1.82 ng/L), and 10% (LoQ 10% CV, 4,74 ng/L), which are comparable to those previously reported for other hs-cTnI methods. Moreover, the clinical results of the hs-cTnI VITROS method were found to be closely correlated to those of hs-cTnI ARCHITECT (R = 0,9883, N = 198) and ECLIA hs-cTnT Elecsys (R = 0,9704, N = 293) methods. CONCLUSIONS: The hs-cTnI VITROS method shows analytical performance comparable to other cTnI and cTnT assay. The results of this study confirm that there are significant systematic differences among hs-cTnI methods. Further multicenter studies using larger reference populations are needed in order to obtain a better estimation, especially of the 99° percentile URL values categorized for sex and age of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masotti et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular diseases and healthy subjects (n=293). VITROS High Sensitivity Troponin I Assay vs. hs-cTnI ARCHITECT and ECLIA hs-cTnT ELECSYS was evaluated on Analytical performance and correlation of clinical results (R = 0.9883 (vs ARCHITECT); R = 0.9704 (vs ELECSYS)). The VITROS high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay demonstrated comparable analytical performance and strong correlation with ARCHITECT (R=0.9883) and ELECSYS (R=0.9704) methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: