Key result
Review details cardiovascular autonomic nervous system pathophysiology and evaluates available testing modalities.
Why the study?
Measures of autonomic function demonstrate prognostic significance across health and disease, but their adoption into clinical practice remains extremely limited.
This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system, its role in health and disease, and the current state of autonomic function testing.
Cautions against overreliance on current autonomic tests clinically; leaves open standardization of modalities for cardiovascular research.
Autonomic neural control of the cardiovascular system is formed of complex and dynamic processes able to adjust rapidly to mitigate perturbations in hemodynamics and maintain homeostasis. Alterations in autonomic control feature in the development or progression of a multitude of diseases with wide‐ranging physiological implications given the neural system's responsibility for controlling inotropy, chronotropy, lusitropy, and dromotropy. Imbalances in sympathetic and parasympathetic neural control are also implicated in the development of arrhythmia in several cardiovascular conditions sparking interest in autonomic modulation as a form of treatment. A number of measures of autonomic function have shown prognostic significance in health and in pathological states and have undergone varying degrees of refinement, yet adoption into clinical practice remains extremely limited. The focus of this contemporary narrative review is to summarize the anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system and describe the merits and shortfalls of testing modalities available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karim et al. (2023) conducted a review in Autonomic cardiovascular control. This narrative review summarizes the anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system and describes the merits and shortfalls of available testing modalities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: