Key result
Ultrasound-guided access for AF ablation linked to ~48% fewer BARC 2+ bleeding complications versus standard care.
Why the study?
Does routine ultrasound-guided vascular access reduce bleeding complications, postprocedural pain, and prolonged bruising in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Cohort (n=309)
No
Does routine ultrasound-guided vascular access reduce bleeding complications, postprocedural pain, and prolonged bruising in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Routine use of ultrasound-guided vascular access during atrial fibrillation ablation significantly reduces bleeding complications, postprocedural pain, and prolonged bruising compared to standard care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ultrasound-guided access to reduce bleeding in AF ablation; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: The most frequent complications of AF ablation (AFA) are related to vascular access, but there is little evidence as to how these can be minimized. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing AFA at a high-volume center received either standard care (Group S) or routine ultrasound-guided vascular access (Group U). Vascular complications were assessed before hospital discharge and by means of postal questionnaire 1 month later. Outcome measures were BARC 2+ bleeding complications, postprocedural pain, and prolonged bruising. RESULTS: Patients in Group S (n = 146) and U (n = 163) were well matched at baseline. Follow-up questionnaires were received from 92.6%. Patients in Group U were significantly less likely to have a BARC 2+ bleed, 10.4% versus 19.9% P = 0.02, were less likely to suffer groin pain after discharge (27.1% vs. 42.8%; P = 0.006) and were less likely to experience prolonged local bruising (21.5% vs. 40.4%; P = 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association of vascular complications with nonultrasound guided access (OR 3.12 95%CI 1.54-5.34; P = 0.003) and increasing age (OR 1.05 95%CI 1.01-1.09; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Routine use of ultrasound-guided vascular access for AFA is associated with a significant reduction in bleeding complications, postprocedural pain, and prolonged bruising when compared to standard care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wynn et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=309). Routine ultrasound-guided vascular access vs. Standard care was evaluated on BARC 2+ bleeding complications (p=0.02). Routine ultrasound-guided vascular access for atrial fibrillation ablation significantly reduced BARC 2+ bleeding complications compared to standard care (10.4% vs 19.9%; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: