Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Much debated in the early 2000s, the productivist/post-productivist transition is revisited from an Antipodean perspective from where it was variously both strongly adopted and vigorously contested as a theorization of rural change. The context in which the terminology of productivism and post-productivism, particularly the various classes of the former, appeared is discussed. Although multifunctionalism is endorsed, the persistence of productivism, especially in nascent forms – protectionist productivism, competitive productivism and super-productivism – is noted. We argue that for an enduring research agenda on multifunctionality to emerge a truly multi-scalar conceptual schema, with accompanying revised terminology, needs to be developed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roche et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: