Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The Asia Pacific, led by the resource-dependent ASEAN-5, is the largest carbon contributor, yet its firms exhibit critically low transparency. This study examines the relationship between voluntary Sustainability Assurance (SA) and carbon disclosure transparency using 875 firm-year observations (2018–2022). Applying panel regression and several robustness tests, we find that SA adoption has a positive relationship with the magnitude of disclosed carbon emissions, indicating enhanced transparency. This positive relationship is significantly more pronounced in firms with high environmental performance and greater property, plant, and equipment (PPE) efficiency, suggesting SA aligns with genuine sustainability efforts rather than symbolic reporting. Furthermore, SA increases the likelihood of disclosing the complex Scope 3 emissions. However, the effectiveness of SA is conditional: its transparency benefit is statistically significant only within mandatory sustainability reporting (SR) regimes and in non-environmentally sensitive industries, highlighting crucial variations across regulatory and industrial contexts within ASEAN-5. This research provides evidence on the role of SA in emerging markets, extending Agency Theory by demonstrating its function as a credibility signal that reduces information asymmetry. We offer practical guidance for managers seeking market differentiation, and for regulators aiming to align voluntary SA with IFRS S1/S2 to enhance disclosure quality.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Novrys Suhardianto
Airlangga University
Abu Hanifa Md. Noman
University of Southampton Malaysia
Senny Harindahyani
Journal of risk and financial management
Airlangga University
University of Surabaya
University of Southampton Malaysia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Suhardianto et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a091e8fa419c5e264d2584b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19010025