Key result
SCAD accounts for ~1% of MIs in non-Western populations.
Why the study?
Current data on spontaneous coronary artery dissection predominantly originate from Europe or Caucasians, leaving limited information about other ethnicities.
Systematic Review
In non-Western populations, SCAD has a prevalence of 1.0% among MI presentations (5.0% in females), with marked heterogeneity in clinical course and management.
Alerts clinicians to SCAD in non-Western female MI patients; extends global data but leaves management open amid heterogeneity.
Current data on spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) predominantly originate from Europe or Caucasians with limited information about other ethnicities. This scoping review presents the evidence on SCAD in non-Western countries. The prevalence of SCAD diagnosis was 1.0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.0–3.0, I2 = 99%] among patients presenting with myocardial infarction, increasing to 5.0% (95% CI: 1.0–16.0, I2 = 99%) among females. The mean age was 51.3 years with females accounting for 54.0% of patients. A conservative revascularization management was reported in 48.0% (95% CI: 32.0–65.0, I2 = 85%) of patients. Antiplatelet therapy was reported as dual (68.0%, 95% CI: 37.0–89.0, I2 = 90%) in only three studies. A death rate (3.0%) was similar during hospitalization and at mean follow-up of 23.42 months. In conclusion, there is a marked variability in the clinical course of patients with SCAD as well heterogeneity among the included studies. This review identified knowledge gaps in our understanding of SCAD in non-Western countries that should be addressed in future prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaddoura et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). In non-Western populations, the prevalence of spontaneous coronary artery dissection among patients presenting with myocardial infarction was 1.0% (95% CI: 0.0-3.0), increasing to 5.0% in females.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: