Key result
N1-methyl-pseudouridine cuts in vitro transcription errors by ~43% versus pseudouridine.
Why the study?
Uridine analogs such as pseudouridine and N1-methyl-pseudouridine are incorporated into synthetic mRNAs to overcome immunogenicity and enhance efficacy, but the fidelity of their incorporation during in vitro transcription was not established.
Does N1-methyl-pseudouridine have higher incorporation fidelity than pseudouridine in synthetic RNAs?
Does N1-methyl-pseudouridine have higher incorporation fidelity than pseudouridine in synthetic RNAs?
N1-methyl-pseudouridine is incorporated with higher fidelity than pseudouridine during in vitro transcription, providing guidelines for generating modified uridine-containing mRNAs.
In vitro transcribed synthetic messenger RNAs (mRNAs) represent a novel therapeutic modality. To overcome the inherent immunogenicity, as well as to increase the therapeutic efficacy of the molecules, uridine analogs—such as pseudouridine (Ψ) and N 1 -methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ), are incorporated in the synthetic mRNA. To decipher the fidelity with which these modifications are incorporated during the in vitro transcription (IVT) process, we compared the incorporation fidelity of uridine analogs with different RNA polymerases. We demonstrate that m1Ψ is incorporated with higher fidelity than Ψ. The fidelity of nucleotide incorporation differs between RNA polymerases; however, the spectrum of mutations observed between the RNAPs is similar. We also show that the array of nucleotide misincorporation is not dependent on the template DNA sequence context and that the distribution of these misincorporated nucleotides is not localized to any specific region along the length of the RNA. Based on our findings, we introduce a novel method to improve uridine analog incorporation fidelity during IVT. Our proof-of-concept experiments for higher-fidelity incorporation of uridine analogs during IVT provide guidelines when choosing RNAPs for the generation of modified uridine-containing mRNAs in vitro.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) studied Synthetic mRNA synthesis. N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) vs. Pseudouridine (Ψ) and canonical uridine was evaluated on Combined transcription and reverse transcription error rate. During in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase, N1-methyl-pseudouridine was incorporated with higher fidelity (7.4 x 10^-5 errors/base) than pseudouridine (1.3 x 10^-4 errors/base).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: