PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 6, 1980New England Journal of Medicine360 citations

Accuracy of the Ventricular Tachycardia-Induction Study for Predicting Long-Term Efficacy and Inefficacy of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

View Full Paper
JMJay W. MasonRWRoger A. Winkle

Key Result

Antiarrhythmic drugs predicted effective by electrophysiologic study yielded significantly higher treatment success at 6 months compared to drugs predicted ineffective (80% vs 33%, P<0.001).

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine the accuracy of a ventricular tachycardia-induction study in predicting the long-term efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs.
  • Evaluated 51 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia.
  • Conducted 58 long-term trials comparing effective vs. ineffective drugs identified through electrophysiologic study.
  • Mean follow-up period of 8.2 months.
  • Arrhythmias recurred significantly less in the effective drug group than the ineffective group (P < 0.001).
  • After 6 months, 80% of patients in the effective group were successfully treated vs. 33% in the ineffective group.
  • At 18 months, the success rates were 68% for the effective group and 11% for the ineffective group.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=51)

Structured PICO

Does the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs predicted to be effective by electrophysiologic study reduce arrhythmia recurrence in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia?

P
Population
51 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia undergoing 58 long-term trials with tested agents
I
Intervention
Antiarrhythmic agents predicted to be effective by electrophysiologic study (ventricular tachycardia-induction by extrastimulation)
C
Comparator
Antiarrhythmic agents predicted to be ineffective by electrophysiologic study
O
Outcome
Recurrence of arrhythmias during long-term follow-uphard clinical

Electrophysiologic testing using ventricular tachycardia-induction accurately predicts the long-term clinical efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 33%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

We evaluated the prophylactic effect of antiarrhythmic agents against induction of ventricular tachycardia by extrastimulation in 51 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia. These patients subsequently underwent 58 long-term trials with tested agents. In 39 trials an agent predicted to be effective by electrophysiologic study was administered, and in 19 a drug predicted to be ineffective was used. There were no clinical differences between the two treatment groups. During a mean follow-up period of 8.2 months, arrhythmias recurred significantly less frequently in the group treated with drugs predicted to be effective than in the other group (P < 0.001); at six months 80 per cent of the patients in the former group were successfully treated, as compared with 33 per cent in the latter group. At 18 months the corresponding figures were 68 per cent and 11 per cent. We conclude that the arrhythmia-induction technique accurately predicts the clinical effectiveness of drugs used in the long-term treatment of recurrent ventricular tachycardia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mason et al. (1980) conducted an observational in Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (n=51). Antiarrhythmic drugs predicted to be effective by electrophysiologic study vs. Antiarrhythmic drugs predicted to be ineffective by electrophysiologic study was evaluated on Successful treatment (no arrhythmia recurrence) at 6 months (p=<0.001). Antiarrhythmic drugs predicted effective by electrophysiologic study yielded significantly higher treatment success at 6 months compared to drugs predicted ineffective (80% vs 33%, P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09340e071d6da4469611bfhttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198011063031901
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper