This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
• Surveyed 2,193 in-service Ecuadorian teachers on neuromyths and pedagogical misconceptions • Over 75% endorsed myths such as multiple intelligences and discovery learning • Greater general brain knowledge predicted fewer learning and instruction misconceptions but higher belief in neuromyths • Training in educational neuroscience was associated with increased belief in neuromyths, but not with learning and instruction misconceptions • Findings underscore the urgent need for evidence-informed and oriented teacher education reforms : Neuromyths, misconceptions about the brain and learning, persist among educators worldwide and may negatively influence teaching practices. In Latin America, and specifically in Ecuador, empirical evidence on their prevalence among in-service teachers remains scarce. : This study examined the prevalence of neuromyths and instructional misconceptions among Ecuadorian in-service teachers and how these beliefs relate to their general brain knowledge. : A survey was administered to 2,193 in-service teachers from Ecuador. It included 17 items on general brain knowledge, 12 neuromyths, and 10 myths about learning and instruction. Multiple linear regressions were conducted to identify demographic factors and other predictors of myth endorsement. : On average, participants answered 59.60% of brain knowledge items correctly. However, they endorsed 61.94% of neuromyths and 60.69% of instructional myths. The most prevalent neuromyths included beliefs in multiple intelligences, enriched environments for preschool brain development, perceptual-motor coordination exercises, and left-/right-brain dominance. Instructional misconceptions such as discovery learning, digital natives, the learning pyramid, motivation-driven learning, and learning styles were also highly endorsed. Interestingly, greater brain knowledge predicted more belief in neuromyths, but less belief in instructional myths. : Despite widespread interest in neuroscience and its perceived relevance for teaching, a large proportion of Ecuadorian in-service teachers continue to endorse misconceptions. These findings reveal significant shortcomings in in-service teacher education and underscore the need for explicitly structured professional development that incorporates core instructional theories, educational neuroscience, and targeted strategies to identify and refute common educational misconceptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: