Randomized trial shows E. coli DnaX efficiently loads β-clamp at nicks using a distinct bending mechanism, indicating a unique DNA repair strategy.
DNA sliding clamps are essential for processive DNA synthesis in all domains of life and are loaded by ATP-dependent clamp loaders that recognize recessed 3′ ends. How clamp loaders function at nicks and small single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps—common DNA repair intermediates—remains unclear. Here, we show that the bacterial E. coli DnaX clamp loader uses a mechanism distinct from its eukaryotic counterpart. Whereas eukaryotic replication factor C (RFC) unwinds DNA at the recessed 3′ end and stabilizes the 5′-dsDNA (double-stranded DNA) at a shoulder site, the bacterial DnaX-complex neither unwinds DNA nor stably binds the 5′-dsDNA in vitro. Instead, cryo-EM structures reveal that the β-clamp contains a conserved external DNA-binding site that bends gapped DNA by ∼150°, promoting insertion of 3′-dsDNA into the clamp. This DNA-bending mechanism enables efficient β-clamp loading at nicks and small gaps and reveals a distinct bacterial strategy likely important for DNA repair. • The bacterial DnaX clamp loader lacks a stable shoulder DNA-binding site • Unlike eukaryotic RFC, DnaX does not unwind DNA at nicks and small gaps • The E. coli β-clamp contains a conserved external DNA-binding site absent in PCNA • Sharp DNA bending enables β-clamp loading at nicks and small ssDNA gaps Zheng et al. show that the bacterial clamp-loader DnaX-complex uses a DNA-bending mechanism—rather than DNA unwinding—to load the β-clamp at nicks and small gaps, which reveals a clamp-loading strategy that is distinct from eukaryotic RFC and relevant to DNA damage repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: