Finds refined immune-MMR subtypes enhance immunotherapy prediction in gastric cancer, suggesting improved risk stratification.
ObjectiveGastric cancer (GC) is heterogeneous, and current mismatch repair (MMR)-based classifications incompletely predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). MethodsRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and immune infiltration profiles from 189 resected GC were used to derive four refined immune-MMR subtypes (R1−R4) by integrating MMR status, survival, and tumor microenvironment (TME) features. Multi-omics profiling and pathway analysis defined subtype biology. External transcriptomic cohorts and an ICI-treated cohort were classified with Nearest Template Prediction (NTP). Immune response-associated genes were identified from responder vs. non-responder comparisons within the ICI-sensitive subtype and validated by multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). ResultsR1 showed the best prognosis and highest immunotherapy response with objective response rate (ORR) 54.5%, while R4 had the worst prognosis. R2 represented an immune-unresponsive deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) subset, and R3 captured an immune-active proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) subgroup with moderate therapy sensitivity. Multi-omics integration revealed subtype-specific pathways (e.g., ECM remodeling in R1, metabolic reprogramming in R2). Reclassification of pMMR tumors based on transcriptional similarity to R1 identified a New R3 subset with enhanced immune features and higher ICI response. Eight immune response-associated genes (e.g., CXCL10, CXCL11, ELN, GAD1, IL32, MT1E, OR2I1P, SLC3A1) were identified and validated by mIHC for predictive relevance. ConclusionsThis immune-based molecular framework refines risk stratification beyond conventional MMR categories, identifies ICI-sensitive subsets among both dMMR and pMMR tumors, and proposes candidate biomarkers for patient selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: