PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Chinese Journal of Cancer Research1 citationsOpen Access

Refined immune-based molecular subtypes of gastric cancer: Integrating mismatch repair status and tumor microenvironment for enhanced immunotherapy prediction

KSKe ShenZYZhang YanqiangWZWang Zhiqin

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a refined classification of gastric cancer that accurately predicts responses to immunotherapy based on mismatch repair status and tumor microenvironment.
  • Used RNA sequencing and immune infiltration profiles from 189 resected gastric cancer specimens.
  • Derived four immune-MMR subtypes (R1-R4) integrating MMR status and tumor microenvironment characteristics.
  • Classified external cohorts and identified immune response-associated genes through comparisons of responders and non-responders.
  • Subtype R1 exhibited the best prognosis with an objective response rate of 54.5%, while subtype R4 presented the worst prognosis.
  • R2 identified an immune-unresponsive dMMR subset, and R3 indicated an immune-active pMMR subgroup with moderate therapy sensitivity.
  • Validated eight immune response-associated genes, which serve as potential biomarkers for improving immunotherapy predictions.

Abstract

ObjectiveGastric cancer (GC) is heterogeneous, and current mismatch repair (MMR)-based classifications incompletely predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). MethodsRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and immune infiltration profiles from 189 resected GC were used to derive four refined immune-MMR subtypes (R1−R4) by integrating MMR status, survival, and tumor microenvironment (TME) features. Multi-omics profiling and pathway analysis defined subtype biology. External transcriptomic cohorts and an ICI-treated cohort were classified with Nearest Template Prediction (NTP). Immune response-associated genes were identified from responder vs. non-responder comparisons within the ICI-sensitive subtype and validated by multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). ResultsR1 showed the best prognosis and highest immunotherapy response with objective response rate (ORR) 54.5%, while R4 had the worst prognosis. R2 represented an immune-unresponsive deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) subset, and R3 captured an immune-active proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) subgroup with moderate therapy sensitivity. Multi-omics integration revealed subtype-specific pathways (e.g., ECM remodeling in R1, metabolic reprogramming in R2). Reclassification of pMMR tumors based on transcriptional similarity to R1 identified a New R3 subset with enhanced immune features and higher ICI response. Eight immune response-associated genes (e.g., CXCL10, CXCL11, ELN, GAD1, IL32, MT1E, OR2I1P, SLC3A1) were identified and validated by mIHC for predictive relevance. ConclusionsThis immune-based molecular framework refines risk stratification beyond conventional MMR categories, identifies ICI-sensitive subsets among both dMMR and pMMR tumors, and proposes candidate biomarkers for patient selection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095ac47880e6d24efe09dbhttps://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2026.02.09
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper