PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology0 citations

Predictive Value of Single-Fiber Electromyography for Ocular Myasthenia Gravis in a Low Prevalence Cohort

View Full Paper
YGYorjannys GomezAPAraya PuwanantJCJames B. Caress

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the predictive value of single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) for diagnosing ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) in a low prevalence cohort.
  • Retrospective chart review of patients referred for possible OMG over one year.
  • Analysis of long-term accuracy of SFEMG in a cohort of 33 patients.
  • Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity based on jitter metrics.
  • 11 of 33 patients (33%) diagnosed with neuromuscular transmission disease with SFEMG showing 100% sensitivity.
  • SFEMG was normal in 22 patients (100% specificity) when strict criteria were applied.
  • Abnormal jitter criteria required 3 abnormal pairs or elevated mean jitter.

Abstract

Purpose: Single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) is a sensitive test to diagnose ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) when the clinical suspicion is high but the predictive value of the test is also dependent on the prevalence of the condition in the referral population. In a low prevalence population, false positive results can be as common as true positive results. Most of the patients referred for SFEMG at our center do not have symptoms or signs that are strongly suggestive for OMG. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients referred to our laboratory for possible OMG for a 1-year period and analyzed the long-term accuracy of SFEMG in a cohort of 33 patients. Results: Eleven of these (33%) were eventually diagnosed with a disease of neuromuscular transmission and SFEMG was abnormal in all of these (100% sensitivity). With the requirement that 3 jitter pairs be abnormal or that mean jitter was elevated, SFEMG was normal in the remaining 22 patients (100% specific). Conclusions: The results confirm that SFEMG is an excellent confirmatory test when clinical suspicion for OMG is high and also demonstrate that when strict criteria are applied, the test accurately excludes OMG in patients with ocular complaints that are not truly suggestive of OMG.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gomez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095af37880e6d24efe0bc5https://doi.org/10.1097/wnp.0000000000001267
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper