PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Nano Letters0 citationsOpen Access

Hydrophobicity Does Not Affect Water Slip: Insights from Slip Length Mapping

View Full Paper
HIHaruya IshidaKTKoji TakahashiVGVishwanath Ganesan

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the influence of hydrophobicity on the slip lengths of water at solid interfaces.
  • Used frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy for nanoscale mapping of slip length and topography.
  • Achieved a 159-fold increase in slip length detection sensitivity.
  • Tested various substrates, measuring true slip lengths in flat regions.
  • True slip lengths on flat surfaces were nearly zero, conforming to molecular dynamics predictions.
  • A slip length of 43.2 ± 5.8 nm was recorded on graphite in deionized water, which disappeared in electrolyte solutions.
  • Graphite's slip behavior was attributed to its smoothness, chemical uniformity, and ion interaction.

Abstract

While slip at solid–water interfaces has attracted broad interest, slip lengths reported in experiments─especially on hydrophobic surfaces (i.e., contact angles >90°)─vary widely due to surface topographical and chemical heterogeneity, hindering quantitative understanding of the true slip length. Using highly sensitive frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy, we achieved simultaneous nanoscale mapping of slip length and surface topography, with a 159-fold improvement in slip length detection sensitivity. True slip lengths measured on flat regions of various substrates were found to be almost zero, following a scaling rule predicted by molecular dynamics simulations. As the only exception, a large slip length of 43.2 ± 5.8 nm was measured on graphite in deionized water, but it vanished upon immersion in electrolyte solutions. This unique behavior was rationalized by graphite’s atomic-scale smoothness, chemical homogeneity, and ion adsorption. Our method experimentally advances a unified picture of fluid slip.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ishida et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b1b7880e6d24efe0d22https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6c01403
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The structure of graphitic carbons1951 · 749 citations
  2. 2Ultrafast water permeation through nanochannels with a densely fluorous interior surface2022 · 229 citations
  3. 3Hydrodynamic slip in nanoconfined flows: a review of experimental, computational, and theoretical progress2024 · 39 citations
  4. 4A Universal Model of Water Flow Through Nanopores in Unconventional Reservoirs: Relationships Between Slip, Wettability and Viscosity2016 · 15 citations
  5. 5Water Slippage versus Contact Angle: A Quasiuniversal Relationship2008 · 511 citations