PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Primary Health Care Research & Development0 citationsOpen Access

The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Chronic Conditions Physician–Patient Relationship Scale in family medicine practice

DBDuygu Ayhan BaşerHacettepe UniversityOÇOğulcan ÇömeDokuz Eylül UniversityESEmre SarıSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi

Key Points

  • This study aims to adapt the Chronic Conditions Physician–Patient Relationship Scale into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability.
  • Conducted a methodological study with 254 adult patients attending Family Medicine Centers
  • Adaptation followed World Health Organization guidelines
  • Evaluated construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis and reliability using Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω.
  • Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a one-factor structure with excellent model fit (χ2 [209] = 59.847, p = 1.000)
  • Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s α = 0.977; McDonald’s ω = 0.976)
  • Significant associations found between relationship scores and marital/employment status, type of health institution (p < 0.05).

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to adapt the Chronic Conditions Physician–Patient Relationship Scale (CC-PPR) into Turkish and to examine its validity and reliability among patients with chronic diseases receiving care from family physicians. Methods: A methodological study was conducted with 254 adult patients attending the Family Medicine Centers between May 01-October 01, 2025. The adaptation process followed World Health Organization guidelines. Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω ) and item–total correlations. Results: The CFA supported the original one-factor, 22-item structure with an excellent model fit ( χ 2 209 = 59.847, p = 1.000; comparative fit index CFI = 1.000; Tucker–Lewis index TLI = 1.016; root mean square error of approximation RMSEA = 0.000; standardized root mean square residual SRMR = 0.048). Sampling adequacy was good (Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin KMO = 0.970; Bartlett’s χ 2 231 = 5934.429, p < 0.001). All standardized factor loadings were high (0.63–0.81, p < 0.001). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s α = 0.977; McDonald’s ω = 0.976), and corrected item–total correlations ranged from 0.74 to 0.86. Marital status, employment status, and type of health institution were significantly associated with relationship scores ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the CC-PPR is a psychometrically robust, unidimensional, and reliable tool for evaluating the quality of family physician–patient relationships among individuals with chronic conditions. It can be used to assess communication and relational competencies of family physicians, support patient-centred care initiatives in chronic disease management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Başer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b1b7880e6d24efe0e09https://doi.org/10.1017/s1463423626101236
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper