PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Automated Global Positioning Layout (GPL) for accuracy assessment in CAD-CAM mandibular reconstruction – method introduction

EVElisa VargiuGMGiorgia MenapaceGBGiordana Bettini

Key Points

  • The aim is to introduce and assess the accuracy of the Global Positioning Layout (GPL) method for CAD-CAM mandibular reconstruction.
  • Introducing the Global Positioning Layout (GPL) method integrated into CAD-CAM protocols.
  • Developing a unique coordinate system (GPL-RS) based on the reference mandible for measurement.
  • Analyzing accuracy in five clinical cases by comparing manual and automated assessment methods.
  • The GPL method provided significant insights into spatial deviations in jaw reconstructions.
  • Automated methods displayed higher repeatability and reproducibility compared to manual techniques.
  • Measurable deviations between planned and postoperative models were successfully quantified using Roto-Translational Matrices.

Abstract

Abstract Assessing accuracy in CAD-CAM mandibular reconstruction poses significant challenges but is essential for ensuring reliable outcomes. Existing methods are often operator-dependent, lacking repeatability and reproducibility. This study introduces the Global Positioning Layout (GPL) method, an accuracy assessment technique integrated into the reconstruction protocol based on CAD-CAM and additive printing technology. We describe its methodology and present its implementation through an automated workflow. Key principles of accuracy assessment were identified and structured as Requirements, Data input, Data reference system, and Data output. The necessary 3D virtual models were defined: planned mandible, reference mandible, patient-specific implant (PSI), postoperative mandible, and postoperative PSI. A unique coordinate system (GPL-RS) was built on the reference mandible. Three Roto-Translational Matrices (RTMs) were applied to measure movements and deviations between the designed and postoperative models to assess reconstruction accuracy. Five clinical cases with different operational diseases and defects were analysed, comparing spatial deviations between manual and automated methods. The GPL method represents a promising advancement in assessing the accuracy of CAD-CAM reconstructions, providing valuable insights that can improve surgical outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vargiu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b3e7880e6d24efe0ed5https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44238-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper