In vitro study compares the shear bond strength of zirconia materials, indicating manufacturing impacts.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) to resin cement of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals materials produced by subtractive and additive manufacturing. Material and Methods: Disc-shaped zirconia specimens were fabricated using either subtractive manufacturing (MZ group; Upcera ST, Shenzhen Upcera, China) or additive manufacturing (3DZ group; 3DMix ZrO₂, 3DCeram Co., France). All samples were ground using silicon carbide abrasive paper and subsequently sandblasted with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles. Resin cement (Variolink Esthetic DC; Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) was then applied to the zirconia surfaces with a custom-made alumina mold and the SBS was subsequently assessed. Surface morphology was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). An independent samples t-test was employed for statistical analysis, with a significance level set at α=0.05. Results: Significant differences in surface roughness and SBS values were observed between the MZ and 3DZ groups. The MZ group (19.18±4.05 MPa) exhibited a significantly higher SBS value compared to the 3DZ group (12.78±1.65 MPa) (p<0.001). No cohesive failure was observed in the 3DZ group, which is consistent with the lower SBS values. Conclusion: Manufacturing technique affected the surface roughness and resin bond strength of the zirconia materials. SEM images showed increased porosities of additively manufactured zirconia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acicbe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: