PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Media analysis reveals the conservation risk of lost and active fishing gear in freshwater ecosystems of Hungary

View Full Paper
VLViktor LökiCentre for Ecological ResearchZNZsolt NeményiUniversity of DebrecenAHA. HagyóUniversity of Debrecen

Key Points

  • To investigate the occurrence and significance of bycatch in Hungary's freshwater habitats and its impact on wildlife.
  • Analyzed over 200 cases of fishing gear interactions with non-fish species from social media data between 1984-2024 in Hungary.
  • Recorded affected species and locations of bycatch incidents.
  • Categorized bycatch cases involving two main types of fishing gear: lines and hooks.
  • Birds constituted 60.6% of the 226 bycaught individuals, followed by reptiles at 27.9%.
  • 72.6% of affected species are protected by Hungarian law, indicating conservation concerns.
  • Lost fishing gear caused 55.5% of entanglements, while active fishing gear accounted for 43%.

Abstract

Bycatch by fishing gear is a major cause of biodiversity loss. While bycatch is relatively well studied in marine ecosystems, there is limited information available on the frequency and the importance of bycatch in freshwater habitats, and the breadth of wildlife taxa affected. To explore this question, we conducted research based on online resources, including four social media platforms. We recorded 200 cases of fishing gear interactions with animals (excluding fish) between 1984 and 2024 in Hungary, along with information on the affected species and the location of the event. A total of 226 individuals of 64 animal species were affected by bycatch. Birds were the most frequently affected (60.6%), followed by reptiles (27.9%), while other taxa accounted for a total of 11.5% of records. The majority (72.6%) of the 226 bycaught individuals belonged to taxa protected by Hungarian law. The overwhelming majority of cases (n = 192, 96.0%) involved only two types of fishing gear: lines and/or fishing hook. Lost fishing gear was responsible for the majority of entanglements (n = 111, 55.5%), but actively used fishing gear was responsible for a comparable number of cases (n = 86, 43%). Our study highlights that bycatch from lost or active fishing gear poses a potential conservation concern requiring systematic investigation in freshwater ecosystems. Many of the affected taxa include species of conservation concern, underscoring the ecological significance of these interactions. In summary, our study highlights the conservation implication of bycatch in freshwater ecosystems, and calls for evaluating the true magnitude of its impact, especially in areas of high conservation importance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Löki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b5d7880e6d24efe11a5https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43420-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper