Compares reproductive technologies' effects on pregnancy rates and calving distribution in beef herds, indicating improved outcomes with advanced methods.
This study evaluated the implementation of reproductive technologies and their effects on pregnancy rates (PRs) and calving distribution. Producers (n = 11) were enrolled in Level 1 or 2 and subsequently transitioned to Level 2 or 3. Level 1: females were exposed to natural service (NS) only versus estrous synchronization (7d-CIDR) before NS (SynNS). Level 2: SynNS versus fixed-time artificial insemination (SynAI; 7d-CO-Synch + CIDR) with conventional semen. Level 3: conventional versus sex-skewed semen (FTAI-con and FTAI-sexed, respectively). Artificial insemination occurred 60–66 h post CIDR removal (SynAI; FTAI-con; FTAI-sexed) and bulls were introduced on d 0 (NS and SynNS) or 10–14 d post artificial insemination (SynAI; FTAI-con; FTAI-sexed). Breeding season PRs did not differ between treatments (p > 0.50). In Level 2, SynNS had greater 21 d PRs compared to SynAI (p < 0.01). For Level 3, FTAI-con had greater 21 d PRs compared to FTAI-sexed (p < 0.01). In Level 1, the proportion of cows that calved by day 14 was greater for SynNS compared to NS (p < 0.01). In Level 2, SynAI had a greater proportion calved by day 7 (p = 0.01); however, SynNS had a greater proportion calved by day 21 and 42 (p < 0.01). In Level 3, FTAI-con had a greater proportion calved by day 14 and 21 (p < 0.01) compared to FTAI-sexed. In conclusion, reproductive technologies altered the calving distribution with more calves born earlier.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zoca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: