Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates readability of SpeSC+ in smart contracts, suggesting improvements for non-technical users.
Smart contracts are self-executing programs deployed on blockchains to enable automated and trustless transactions without intermediaries. However, existing smart contracts (e.g., those written in Solidity) resemble general-purpose programs rather than legal contracts, making them incomprehensible to non-technical users. To address this limitation, we present SpeSC + , a domain-specific language (DSL) designed for both readability and legal expressiveness. SpeSC + features a natural-language-like syntax and integrates domain-specific concepts for contractual logic, such as time expressions, parties and authorizations, and obligations and privileges. Unlike existing works that focus on utilizing natural languages for specification, we equip SpeSC + with a formally defined, Turing-complete semantics for precise execution, covering the entire execution process of a legal contract. We evaluated SpeSC + ’s expressiveness by implementing 35 real-world legal contracts across 10 business domains and 5 canonical Solidity examples. A controlled user study further demonstrated SpeSC + ’s superior readability over Solidity, particularly for users without programming expertise, without compromising expressiveness. We also measured the gas usage and detected vulnerabilities in the Solidity programs generated by the SpeSC + code generator. The evaluation results suggest that SpeSC + lowers the barrier to creating and understanding legally enforceable smart contracts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: