PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Water Practice & Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Hybrid defences for flash-flood resilience: multi-scenario assessment of grey and nature-based solutions in Indonesia's watershed

View Full Paper
EHEntin HidayahUniversitas JemberYDYeny DhokhikahUniversitas JemberHSHari SulistyowatiUniversitas Jember

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of hybrid grey and nature-based solutions for flash-flood resilience in steep-gradient watersheds.
  • Assessed four mitigation scenarios: existing conditions, grey infrastructure, nature-based solutions, and hybrid grey-nature approach.
  • Utilized Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System and Hydrologic Engineering Center–River Analysis System for simulations.
  • Compared effects on peak discharge, flood depth, and inundation area to determine the most effective strategy.
  • Hybrid approach decreased peak discharge by 37%, flood depth by 42%, and inundation area by 39% (4.81 to 2.91 km2).
  • Grey infrastructure primarily reduced flow velocity while nature-based solutions improved infiltration and runoff delay.
  • Combined effects of hybrid solutions resulted in greater risk reduction than either strategy alone, highlighting the need for integrated approaches.

Abstract

ABSTRACT A graphical abstract illustrating hybrid flood defence strategies in the Jompo Watershed, showing the transition from existing conditions to a combination of grey infrastructure and nature-based solutions (land restoration and retention ponds) to reduce peak flow, flood depth, and inundation. Steep-gradient rivers such as the Jompo Watershed in Jember Regency, East Java, are highly prone to flash floods. This study assesses four mitigation scenarios using Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System and Hydrologic Engineering Center–River Analysis System: (i) existing conditions, (ii) grey infrastructure, (iii) Nature-based Solutions (NbS) involving land restoration and retention ponds, and (iv) a hybrid grey–NbS approach. Among these, the hybrid scenario produced the strongest risk reduction, decreasing peak discharge by 37%, flood depth by 42%, and inundation area by 39% (from 4.81 to 2.91 km2). Grey infrastructure primarily reduced flow velocity, whereas NbS increased infiltration, storage, and runoff delay. Their combined effects generated greater attenuation than either strategy alone. The magnitude of reduction reflects the watershed's steep slopes and limited spatial availability, which constrain mitigation performance relative to wider or low-gradient basins. Overall, the results suggest that relying solely on conventional grey infrastructure is insufficient for steep tropical watersheds. Hybrid solutions offer a more cost-effective and ecologically sustainable alternative, enhancing both hydraulic performance and catchment resilience. The study provides an evidence-based framework that supports SDG 11 on resilient urban development and can be applied to similar flash-flood-prone tropical catchments facing heightened climate risks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hidayah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b8e7880e6d24efe154bhttps://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2026.282
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper