Evaluates diuron degradation in ethanol with mixed-metal-oxide anodes, suggesting toxicity risks remain post-treatment.
This work evaluates Ti/Ti 0.7 Ru 0.3 O 2 , Ti/Ti 0.7 Ir 0.3 O 2 , and Ti/Ti 0.7 Nb 0.3 O 2 mixed‐metal‐oxide (MMO) anodes for the degradation of the herbicide diuron in a non‐aqueous ethanolic medium using electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, and photoelectrocatalysis. Except for the commercial Ti/RuO 2 DSA, all anodes were prepared by thermal decomposition and characterized by XRD, UV–Vis DRS, and FEG‐SEM/EDS to correlate crystalline, optical, and morphological features with electrochemical behavior. Degradation performance was assessed by removal efficiency, pseudo‐first‐order kinetics, synergy index, and energy consumption. Electrocatalysis, Ti/RuO 2 , achieved the highest diuron removal (60.3%). Under photocatalytic conditions, removals of 98.2%, 87.2%, and 91.5% were obtained for Ti/RuO 2 , Ti/IrO 2 , and Ti/Nb 2 O 5 , respectively. Photoelectrocatalysis, Ti/RuO 2 , and Ti/IrO 2 reached 98.5% and 98.2% removal, whereas Ti/Nb 2 O 5 attained only 78.6%, indicating limited benefit from process coupling due to poor conductivity. Only Ti/IrO 2 exhibited a pronounced synergistic effect (SI = 1.45), enhancing degradation kinetics without additional energy demand, while Ti/RuO 2 and Ti/Nb 2 O 5 showed non‐synergistic behavior (SI < 1). LC–MS revealed several intermediates, including ethoxylated and hydroxylated species and the more toxic 3,4‐dichloroaniline, suggesting that high degradation efficiency is not directly correlated with a reduction in ecotoxicological risk. Overall, Ti/RuO 2 is an efficient benchmark, and Ti/IrO 2 is a promising MMO for ethanol‐based photoelectrocatalytic treatment when toxicity evolution is carefully monitored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faria et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: