Systematic review estimates that osteopathic manipulative treatment reduces pain and improves function in chronic low back pain, indicating its clinical utility.
Context Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is common and often managed within multimodal, nonpharmacologic pathways. Clarifying sham-controlled effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) can guide early clinical decisions. Objectives This study aims to estimate the short-term (≤6 weeks) effects of OMT for CLBP, emphasizing sham-controlled comparisons. Methods We preregistered a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO [Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews] CRD420251154852) and followed PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020). Randomized trials enrolling adults with CLBP compared OMT with sham/attenuated OMT, usual care, or wait-list. The co-primary outcomes were pain (0–10; mean difference [MD]) and function (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] or Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]; standardized mean difference [SMD]). Analyses were prespecified at end-of-treatment (≤6 weeks); the single crossover trial contributed pre-crossover data only. Searches covered MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase (EMBASE [Excerpta Medica dataBASE]), CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health), and ClinicalTrials.gov through October 2025. Random-effects models (DerSimonian–Laird with Hartung–Knapp) summarized effects with I 2 and prediction intervals (PIs); risk of bias (RoB 2) and certainty (GRADE [Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation]) were assessed. Results Seven trials (n≈378) met the inclusion criteria. Across five trials, OMT reduced pain vs. comparators: MD −1.32 on 0–10 scales (95 % confidence interval [CI], −1.71 to −0.93; I 2 =6 %; 95 % PI, −2.05 to −0.59). In sham-controlled analyses of function limited to ODI/RMDQ (k=2), OMT improved disability: SMD 1.75 (95 % CI, 1.37 to 2.13; I 2 =0 %). Adverse events were infrequently reported; where monitored, no serious adverse events were attributed to OMT. Certainty by GRADE was moderate for short-term pain and for sham-controlled function. Conclusions At ≤6 weeks, OMT reduces pain and improves function vs. sham without observed serious harms, supporting its use as a low-risk adjunct within guideline-concordant, nonopioid CLBP care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheppard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: