PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion0 citations

Religious Representation in Science: How Scientists in the United States, Mexico, and South Africa Respond

View Full Paper
MBMoses BineyZHZikang HouEEElaine Howard Ecklund

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how scientists in the U.S., Mexico, and South Africa perceive and interact with religious individuals in science.
  • Conducted 53 in-depth interviews with biologists and physicists at leading universities in the United States, Mexico, and South Africa.
  • Analyzed responses to understand attitudes towards religious individuals in scientific contexts.
  • Explored themes of openness and the implication of religion in scientific work.
  • Scientists show an openness to religious individuals but express concerns about incorporating religion into scientific activities.
  • Findings indicate a phenomenon termed 'safe siloing,' where boundaries are maintained between religion and science.
  • Highlights the identity suppression and boundary work religious scientists experience within these academic environments.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many institutions seek to increase representation in science by addressing the limited presence of certain racial and gender groups. These efforts often overlook religion as a dimension of stratification and its connections to other identities. Research on religion and science has focused more on scientists' attitudes toward religion than on the presence of religious individuals within scientific communities. Filling these gaps, this study examines how scientists in the United States, Mexico, and South Africa respond to religious people in science. Drawing on 53 in‐depth interviews with biologists and physicists at leading universities in these countries, we find that while scientists narratively express openness toward religious individuals, they often include the caveat that religion should not enter scientific work, rendering religious people themselves suspect. Many participate in what we call “safe siloing.” These findings highlight subtle forms of boundary work and identity suppression that religious scientists must navigate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Biney et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095bdd7880e6d24efe1a8bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70068
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How religious scientists balance work and faith2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Representation in Science and Trust in Scientists in the United States2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Faith and facts: Exploring the intersection of religion and science among anatomy educators2024
  4. 4Beyond Falsification, Fabrication, and Plagiarism: Religion and Ethical Thinking Among Scientists in Three National Contexts2026
  5. 5Impacts of Sharing an Instructor's Religious Identity on Students in a Large-Enrollment Introductory Biology Course2026