Randomized trial derives quantum predictions from complex-scale mechanics, suggesting novel insights into energy corrections.
Paper 13 [3] conjectured that the scale coordinate of the (x, y, z, s) framework is a single complex value zs ∈ C. Paper 17 [5] established that classical field equations are neutral with respect to the imaginary part sI , placing the conjecture correctly in the quantum sector. This paper derives the first concrete, testable quantum-mechanical prediction of the complex-scale framework, resolved through four steps. The native Lagrangian is manifestly real; this requires the potential V (x^µ, zs) ∈ R, which automatically forbids imaginary energy corrections and ensures classical neutrality without any separate projection step. The complex-scale sector enters quantum mechanics through a Born-Huang-type geometric projection of the hidden sI -sector onto the configurational wavefunction. Because sR = ln(r/ℓ0) varies with position, the geometric scalar potential of the projection is ∆Hˆcs = ℏ^2/2me Gs(Φ) 1/r^2, where Gs(Φ) is the quantum metric of the sI -sector. Writing λ = ℏ^2 Gs/(2mea^20 EH) (dimensionless), the complex-scale energy correction to hydrogenic state |nℓm⟩ is ∆Enℓ(Φ) = λ Φ/c^2 EH/(n^3 (ℓ + 1/2)), ∆Enℓ ∈ R. For a clock transition |a⟩ → |b⟩ at two heights: ∆ϕ^(12)ab(T ) = −λEH/ℏ Fab (Φ1 − Φ2)/c^2 T, Fab = 1/(n^3a (ℓa + 1/2)) − 1/(n^3b (ℓb + 1/2)). The level-structure factor Fab makes the correction non-universal: it differs between transitions and cannot be mimicked by standard gravitational redshift. The dimensionless coupling is bounded by current optical clock precision, λ ≲ 2 × 10^−9, while the natural framework estimate λnat ≈ 4 × 10^−16 is safely consistent with all existing measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donald G Palmer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: