Examines employment changes around a mixed-use arena district, suggesting the need for nuanced evaluations of urban redevelopment effects.
Mixed-use arena districts are often promoted as catalysts of central-city redevelopment, yet employment change around them may unfold unevenly across nearby urban space. Focusing on the Golden 1 Center–Downtown Commons district in downtown Sacramento, this study examines how private workplace employment was reorganized within a broader arena-centered redevelopment context. Using California Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) Workplace Area Characteristics data, the analysis constructs a fixed census-block panel within an 8 km field for 2002–2023 and traces change across nested distance bands in employment scale, internal redistribution, earnings composition, block activity, and sectoral structure. The findings do not support a simple proximity gradient or a uniform story of local uplift. The adjacent 0.5–1 km ring followed an aggregate contraction path shaped by localized sectoral disruption, whereas the 1–2 km belt became a spatially concentrated professional-service expansion zone. The 0–0.5 km core strengthened through selective functional upgrading, marked by growth in professional, health-related, leisure-oriented, and food-service activities. The case is therefore better understood as differentiated spatial restructuring than as a direct arena effect. This study underscores the need for multi-zone, multidimensional, and causally cautious evaluation of arena-centered redevelopment in debates on sustainable urban futures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young Jae Kim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: