Identifies dual DUSP4/6 inhibitors to improve outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma, suggesting new therapeutic avenues.
Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortalities both in Canada and worldwide. This is due to limited treatment options with curative potential as a result of therapeutic resistance. This underlies the need for novel therapeutics with new gene targets and mechanisms of action. Patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have a number of driver gene mutations that upregulate signaling through the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, and its key effectors, the extracellular signal regulated kinases (ERK1/2). Conventional targeted therapies aim to downregulate ERK signaling. However, recent findings have shown that excessive ERK1/2 signaling, termed ERK hyperactivation, can be toxic to cancer cells. ERK1/2 signaling is regulated by dual specificity phosphatases (DUSP) 4 and 6, highlighting the potential of DUSP4/6 inhibition as a novel avenue for LUAD therapeutic development. There is currently no dual inhibitor of DUSP4/6. The aim of this thesis work was to screen and identify small molecule dual inhibitors of DUSP4/6, and to evaluate their therapeutic potential in LUAD. Through enzymatic assays using purified DUSP4 and DUSP6, I screened two lead compounds and 57 derivatives for their ability to act as dual inhibitors. I identified a compound termed VPC002 as a candidate dual inhibitor and found that it is more potent than (E)-2-benzylidene-3-(cyclohexylamino)-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one (BCI), a known DUSP6 inhibitor. In models of LUAD harbouring MAPK activating mutations, I found that VPC002 induced ERK hyperactivation. In those same models, VPC002 was able to reduce cell viability. Testing in LC lines without MAPK mutations also induced toxicity, potentially as a result of off-target effects. These results provide insight into VPC002’s mechanism of action and highlight the potential of dual DUSP inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in LUAD. Overall, this screening pipeline provides a foundation for the future development of novel LUAD therapeutics to improve patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. Subramaniam (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: