PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Environmental Science and Ecotechnology0 citationsOpen Access

Oceanographic regime and foraging behaviour structure compound-specific PFAS variability in Arctic-Atlantic guillemots

View Full Paper
RSRui ShenRERalf EbinghausDVDaniel G. Vassão

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine how individual variability in PFAS exposure among guillemots reflects ecological signals related to habitat use and foraging behaviour.
  • Sampled two guillemot species (Uria aalge, n=67; Uria lomvia, n=45) across five Icelandic colonies during the 2018 breeding season.
  • Used plasma PFAS concentrations and isotopic analysis (δ13C and δ15N) to assess individual exposure and foraging stability.
  • Conducted cluster analysis and bivariate segmented regression to analyze PFAS variability in relation to environmental factors.
  • PFAS variability strongly structured by compound class: long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (79% variance), PFOS (13%).
  • Oceanographic regime influences PFOS variability significantly, particularly in Atlantic-influenced waters.
  • Fine-scale niche partitioning contributes to unique compound-specific variability patterns among individuals.

Abstract

Current chemical exposures studies characterise chemical risk through mean-based concentrations, treating individual-level variability as statistical noise. However, this variability may carry structured ecological information that mean-based approaches systematically overlook. Here, we propose that individual per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) exposure variability constitutes a structured ecological signal, shaped by habitat use across oceanographic gradients and individual foraging behaviour, one that mean-based approaches are not designed to capture. To test the variability-as-signal hypothesis, we integrated two independent indices of individual stability using two sympatric guillemot species ( Uria aalge, n = 67 and Uria lomvia, n = 45 ) sampled across five Icelandic colonies during the 2018 breeding season. We paired PFAS variability scores, derived from plasma PFAS concentrations, with isotopic consistency scores derived from dual-tissue stable isotopes (δ 13 C and δ 15 N in plasma and red blood cells). These consistency scores represent individual foraging stability across the breeding season, enabling a reconstruction of foraging histories and oceanographic habitat use. Our results reveal that PFAS variability is highly structured by compound class, dominated by long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs; 79% of variance) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS; 13%). Cluster analysis identified two main divergent exposure states: constrained PFOS variability versus constrained PFCA variability. Bivariate segmented regression revealed a hierarchical structure to contaminant acquisition: oceanographic regime (proxied by δ 13 C consist ) functioned as the primary driver, with PFOS variability intensifying in Atlantic-influenced waters. Within these regimes, trophic sources (proxied by δ 15 N consist ) emerged as a secondary, conditional modulator, specifically constraining PFCA variability among high-trophic individuals. At the colony scale, fine-scale niche partitioning, such as vertical foraging strategies and individual specialisation using glacial fjords and ice margins, produced compound-specific patterns that diverged from regional hierarchies. As climate change continues to redistribute Arctic and Atlantic water masses and reshape the food web structures, approaches that treat contaminant variability as ecological signal will be increasingly valuable for anticipating exposure regime shifts. • PFAS variability constitutes a structured ecological signal of habitat use and foraging behaviours, not statistical noise. • Isotopes reveal a hierarchy: water masses (δ 13 C) shape PFOS variability; trophic marker (δ 15 N) modulates PFCA variability. • Atlantic foraging amplifies PFOS variability; elevated trophic positions constrain PFCA variability. • Fine-scale niche partitioning likely generates localised variability patterns that diverge from regional hierarchies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c037880e6d24efe1eb6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2026.100707
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper