Linear assets (LAs), such as conveyor systems, road networks, pipelines, and power transmission lines, are typically maintained through localized, segment-based interventions. While such approaches effectively address spatially heterogeneous degradation, they often neglect the system-level consequences of repeated local actions. In particular, improvements in segment condition may be accompanied by increased structural complexity, leading to reduced reliability and higher lifecycle costs. This paper proposes a unified engineering framework that integrates segment-level condition assessment with system-level structural effects. The framework is based on a dual representation of asset condition, distinguishing between material state (MS) and structural state (SS), which correspond to material aging (MA) and structural aging (SA), respectively. A key contribution is the introduction of the fragmentation penalty (FP), capturing the negative impact of increasing segmentation and interface density on system performance. The framework incorporates multi-threshold decision logic, enabling differentiation between operational, refurbishment, and replacement regimes, and interprets maintenance actions as transformations affecting both condition and structure. A formal model is developed to represent the asset as a dynamic system of segments and interfaces. It provides a basis for future empirical calibration and structure-aware optimization. Although the model is developed using conveyor belt loops as a reference case, its broader relevance is discussed for other classes of linear assets with repeated local intervention and evolving structural heterogeneity. A simple worked example is included to demonstrate the operational meaning of the proposed fragmentation-aware perspective. The results show that maintenance decisions may change when structural side effects are considered together with local condition improvement, and they provide a basis for future empirical calibration and structure-aware optimization of maintenance strategies.
Błażej et al. (Fri,) studied this question.