PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in ARID1A-mutated advanced gastric cancer

View Full Paper
JSJi Eun ShinELE LeeSLSung Hee Lim

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in ARID1A-mutated advanced gastric cancer and correlate it with molecular features.
  • Retrospective, single-center cohort study of 258 advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer patients receiving ICI plus chemotherapy.
  • ARID1A mutation status and other molecular features evaluated using next-generation sequencing from 2022 to 2024.
  • Outcomes compared between ARID1A-mutant and wild-type groups.
  • 26.0% of patients had ARID1A mutations, showing higher tumor mutational burden (median 18.0 vs 6.7 mut/Mb).
  • ARID1A mutant tumors had higher rates of EBV positivity (11.8% vs 0.6%) and PD-L1 CPS ≥50 (14.9% vs 1.0%).
  • Median progression-free survival was longer in the ARID1A mutant group (9.7 vs 8.5 months; HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53–1.10), though not statistically significant.

Abstract

Background: ARID1A mutations are frequent in gastric cancer (GC) and may indicate an immune-active tumor microenvironment. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced GC and explore its association with key molecular features according to the status of ARID1A-mutation. Design: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Methods: We analyzed 258 patients with advanced HER2-negative GC who received ICI plus chemotherapy between 2022 and 2024. ARID1A mutation status and other molecular features were assessed using next-generation sequencing. Also, the status for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and claudin 18.2 was done. Treatment outcomes were evaluated between ARID1A-mutant and wild-type groups. Results: Among 258 patients, 67 (26.0%) harbored at least one ARID1A mutation. ARID1A mutant tumors (MT) showed significantly higher tumor mutational burden (median 18.0 vs 6.7 mut/Mb), EBV positivity (11.8% vs 0.6%), MSI-H status (10.6% vs 6.3%), and PD-L1 CPS ⩾50 (14.9% vs 1.0%) compared to wild-type (WT). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in the ARID1A MT group (9.7 vs 8.5 months; HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53–1.10), though not statistically significant. There was no significant difference for the ORR (55.2% vs 64.4%, p = 0.19), and the overall survival (27.4 vs 31.1 months; HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.58–1.20) between the two groups. Conclusion: ARID1A mutations were associated with immune-active molecular features and a trend toward improved PFS to ICI plus chemotherapy. Further research for ARID1A as a potential biomarker for ICI is warranted in advanced GC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c3f7880e6d24efe251chttps://doi.org/10.1177/17562848261446862
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper