PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Polymers for Advanced Technologies7 citationsOpen Access

Integrated Experimental and Machine Learning‐Based Predictive Analysis of FDM Parameters for Conductive PLA ‐Based Composites

View Full Paper
MAMehmet Ali AltuncuOÜOsman ÜlkirMKMelih Kuncan

Key Points

  • The study aims to examine how different fused deposition modeling parameters affect tensile strength and electrical conductivity in conductive PLA-based composites.
  • Utilized a full factorial design yielding 81 unique parameter combinations.
  • Conducted statistical analysis using ANOVA to determine influential factors.
  • Developed machine learning models (RF, KNN, DKL) to predict outcomes.
  • For tensile strength, RF and KNN models achieved R2 values of 0.8582 and 0.8899; DKL model achieved R2 = 0.9999.
  • For electrical conductivity, RF and KNN models produced R2 values of 0.9001 and 0.8810; DKL model again showed R2 = 0.9999.
  • Lower printing speed, higher infill density, lower layer thickness, and higher nozzle temperature enhanced both tensile strength and electrical conductivity.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parameters on the tensile strength and electrical conductivity of conductive polylactic acid (PLA)‐based composites. An integrated experimental and machine learning (ML)‐based framework was used. Printing speed (PS), infill density (ID), layer thickness (LT), and nozzle temperature (NT) were determined as printing parameters. A full factorial design was employed, yielding 81 unique parameter combinations. Experimental results showed that both tensile strength and electrical conductivity were affected by the selected printing parameters. Tensile strength ranged from 16.44 to 49.14 MPa, and electrical conductivity ranged from 0.01332 to 0.10442 S/cm. Overall, lower speed, higher density, lower thickness, and higher temperature improved performance. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that ID and LT were the most influential factors, with statistically significant effects ( p < 0.05) for both response variables. ML models were developed to establish predictive relationships between printing parameters and output responses. For this purpose, a random forest (RF), k‐nearest neighbors (KNN), and deep kernel learning (DKL) inspired model were trained and evaluated using five‐fold cross‐validation. For tensile strength estimation, the RF and KNN models achieved R 2 values of 0.8582 and 0.8899, respectively, while the DKL‐inspired model provided the highest accuracy with R 2 = 0.9999. Similarly, for electrical conductivity estimation, the RF and KNN models produced R 2 values of 0.9001 and 0.8810, respectively, while the DKL‐inspired model again showed the best performance with R 2 = 0.9999. Sample‐based error analysis further confirmed the superiority of the DKL‐inspired model. For this model, the mean percentage error was 0.14% for tensile strength and 0.28% for electrical conductivity. The results demonstrate that the combined use of experimental design, statistical analysis, and ML provides an effective approach to understanding the multifunctional performance of FDM printed conductive PLA‐based composites.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Altuncu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c3f7880e6d24efe25adhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pat.70626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper