PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026International Journal of Surgical Pathology0 citations

Distinguishing Inverted Sinonasal Papilloma and Respiratory Epithelial Adenomatoid Hamartoma: A Single Institution Case Series

View Full Paper
ASAustin R. SwisherSRSamuel E. RazmiMSMichael T. Sramek

Key Points

  • This research aims to differentiate between inverted sinonasal papilloma and respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma due to their similar features.
  • Case series of four patients with sinonasal lesions misdiagnosed as ISP on frozen section.
  • Permanent pathology confirmed REAH in all patients after initial ISP suspicion.
  • Histologic analysis compared epithelial characteristics of ISP and REAH.
  • All four patients had lesions initially suspected to be ISP, confirmed as REAH on permanent pathology.
  • Histologic analysis identified epithelial thickness as a key feature distinguishing REAH from ISP.
  • ISP requires different management strategies than REAH, highlighting importance of accurate diagnosis.

Abstract

Inverted sinonasal papilloma (ISP) and respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH) are sinonasal lesions with overlapping clinical, radiographic, and histologic features, making accurate diagnosis challenging. ISP is a benign but aggressive tumor with a propensity for local destruction, recurrence, and malignant transformation, whereas REAH is a hamartomatous lesion often arising in the olfactory cleft. We present four patients with lesions initially suspected to be ISP based on intraoperative frozen section but ultimately diagnosed as REAH on permanent pathology. All patients had polypoid sinonasal masses, frequently involving or adjacent to the olfactory cleft. Intraoperative frozen sections were often inconclusive or favored ISP, reflecting the difficulty of distinguishing these entities. Histologic analysis revealed that epithelial thickness served as a key morphologic feature differentiating ISP from REAH, with REAH exhibiting ciliated glandular proliferation and ISP characterized by hyperplastic epithelium with features of columnar and squamous differentiation. These patients underscore the diagnostic pitfalls of small biopsies and frozen sections, and highlight the importance of permanent specimens and collaboration with experienced pathologists. Accurate differentiation is critical, as management strategies differ substantially: ISP requires aggressive resection and long-term surveillance, while REAH may be treated with limited excision and minimal follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Swisher et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c5d7880e6d24efe27b2https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969261446657
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Systematic Review of Definitive Treatment for Inverted Papilloma Attachment Site and Associations With Recurrence2021 · 25 citations
  2. 2Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses and Skull Base2022 · 113 citations
  3. 3Sinonasal adenosquamous carcinomas arising in seromucinous hamartoma or respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma with atypical features: Report of five detailed clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of rare entity2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Respiratory Epithelial Adenomatoid Hamartomas of the Sinonasal Tract and Nasopharynx: A Clinicopathologic Study of 31 Cases1995 · 262 citations
  5. 5The presentation and clinical significance of sinonasal respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH)2012 · 41 citations