PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Palliative & Supportive Care0 citationsOpen Access

Factors associated with depression among people with cancer: Systematic umbrella review

BZBarbara ZaccagninoABArrigo BettellaAOAnna Francesca Olivetti

Key Points

  • This review aims to examine various demographic, biological, and psychological factors associated with depression in cancer patients.
  • Systematic umbrella review of 73 reviews and 514 unique studies of depression and diverse associated factors (DAFs) in cancer.
  • Data extraction focused on DAFs, their associations with depression, and methodological quality assessments.
  • Consistency of findings measured via the proportion of concordant studies for each DAF.
  • Strongest associations identified for sociodemographic factors (high social support, being unmarried), inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), and psychological factors (history of depression, anxiety).
  • Prospective studies revealed consistent associations with cancer-related physical symptoms and time spent on patient communication.
  • Numerous DAFs were associated with depression in cancer, highlighting the need for further research in this area.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Depression in cancer patients is a common condition that poses significant challenges for prognosis, treatment adherence, and quality of life. Its onset reflects the interplay of diverse biological, psychological, and social factors, which has been the focus of numerous studies. METHODS: We identified both systematic and non-systematic reviews examining cross-sectional or prospective studies reporting associations between DAFs and depression. We extracted data relative to DAFs, as well as the direction and statistical significance of the reported association. Consistency of findings was assessed by estimating the proportion of concordant studies (PCS) for each DAF. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using a standardized tool. RESULTS: We identified 73 reviews (26 systematic and/or meta-analyses, 47 narrative) encompassing 514 unique primary studies, reporting the associations between depression and 198 distinct DAFs. DAFs were grouped into six domains (sociodemographic, cancer-related, somatic, psychological, biological-genetic, and other). The strongest associations (PCS ≥ 75% and ≥5 studies) were observed for sociodemographic factors (e.g., high social support, being unmarried), inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), psychological factors (e.g., history of depression, distress, anxiety), and somatic factors (e.g., fatigue, low functional status, malnutrition). When restricting analyses to prospective studies, consistent associations emerged for cancer-related physical symptoms and time dedicated to patient communication. CONCLUSIONS: Depression in cancer is multifactorial, with physical and psychosocial factors likely iteracting dynamically. Prospective studies are still greatly needed. Further research on risk and protective factors may facilitate risk stratification, early diagnosis and patient management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zaccagnino et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c6d7880e6d24efe2840https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951526102247
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper