This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This correspondence concerns real-time Fourier processing of stationary data and examines the widespread belief that coefficients of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) are "almost" uncorrelated. We first show that any uniformly bounded <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N × N</tex> Toeplitz covariance matrix <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">T_N</tex> is asymptotically equivalent to a nonstandard circulant matrix <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">C_N</tex> derived from the DFT of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">T_N</tex> . We then derive bounds on a normed distance between <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">T_N</tex> and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">C_N</tex> for finite <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</tex> , and show that <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> T_N - C_N ^ 2 = O(1/N)</tex> for finite-order Markov processes. Finally we demonstrate that the performance degradation resulting from the use of DFT (as opposed to Karhunen-Loève expansion) in coding and filtering is proportional to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> T_N - C_N </tex> and therefore vanishes as the inverse square root of the block size <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</tex> when <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N → ∞</tex> .
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Pearl (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: