This paper presents a provably convergent multifidelity optimization algorithm for unconstrained problems that does not require high-fidelity gradients. The method uses a radial basis function interpolation to capture the error between a high-fidelity function and a low-fidelity function. The error interpolation is added to the low-fidelity function to create a surrogate model of the high-fidelity function in the neighborhood of a trust region. When appropriately distributed spatial calibration points are used, the low-fidelity function and radial basis function interpolation generate a fully linear model. This condition is sufficient to prove convergence in a trust region framework. In the case when there are multiple lower-fidelity models, the predictions of all calibrated lower-fidelity models can be combined with a maximum likelihood estimator constructed using kriging variance estimates from the radial basis function models. This procedure allows for flexibility in sampling lower-fidelity functions, does not alter the convergence proof of the optimization algorithm, and is shown to be robust to poor low-fidelity information. The algorithm is compared with a single-fidelity quasi-Newton algorithm and two first-order consistent multifidelity trust region algorithms. For simple functions the quasi-Newton algorithm uses slightly fewer high-fidelity function evaluations; however, for more complex supersonic airfoil design problems it uses significantly more. In all cases tested, our radial basis function calibration approach uses fewer high-fidelity function evaluations when compared with first-order consistent trust region schemes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
March et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: