Key result
Percutaneous LAAC achieves 100% procedural success without major events over a year in NVAF hemodialysis patients.
Why the study?
Patients with NVAF and CKD on hemodialysis have high risks of both thrombosis and bleeding, with little evidence and multiple complications regarding oral anticoagulation, making percutaneous LAAC an alternative to evaluate.
Is percutaneous LAAC safe and effective for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF and CKD on hemodialysis?
Case Report (n=8)
Is percutaneous LAAC safe and effective for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF and CKD on hemodialysis?
Percutaneous LAAC appears to be a safe and effective alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in hemodialysis patients with NVAF and high bleeding risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports LAAC feasibility in hemodialysis patients with NVAF; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in randomized trials.
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the general population, and its prevalence increases among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis. This population presents high risk of both hemorrhagic and thrombotic events, with little evidence regarding the use of oral anticoagulation treatment (OAT) and multiple complications arising from it; however, stroke prevention with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to be considered. We retrospectively describe the safety and efficacy of percutaneous LAAC in eight patients with NVAF and CKD on hemodialysis during a 12-month follow-up. The mean age was 78.8 years (range 64–86; SD ± 6.7), and seven patients were male. The mean CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores were high, 4.8 (SD ± 1.5) and 3.8 (SD ± 1.3), respectively. Seventy-five percent of the patients were referred for this intervention due to a history of major bleeding, with gastrointestinal bleeding being the most common type, while the remaining twenty-five percent of the patients were referred because of a high risk of bleeding. The percutaneous LAAC procedure was successfully completed in 100% of the patients, with complete exclusion of the appendage without complications or leaks exceeding 5 mm. There was one death not related to the procedure four days after the intervention. Among the other seven patients, no deaths, cardioembolic events or major bleeding were reported during the follow-up period. In our sample, percutaneous LAAC appears to be a safe and effective alternative to anticoagulation in patients with NVAF and CKD on hemodialysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basabe et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (n=8). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was evaluated on Safety and efficacy (deaths, cardioembolic events, or major bleeding).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: