Key result
BRBES predicts ACS suspicion with ~0.97 AUC, outperforming manual cardiologist assessment, ANN, and SVM.
Why the study?
Does a belief rule-based expert system improve the accuracy of acute coronary syndrome prediction in patients with chest pain compared to cardiologist opinion and other machine learning tools?
Does a belief rule-based expert system improve the accuracy of acute coronary syndrome prediction in patients with chest pain compared to cardiologist opinion and other machine learning tools?
A belief rule-based expert system may provide more dependable predictions of acute coronary syndrome in patients with chest pain compared to clinical opinion and traditional machine learning models, potentially avoiding costly laboratory investigations.
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is responsible for the obstruction of coronary arteries, resulting in the loss of lives. The onset of ACS can be determined by looking at the various signs and symptoms of a patient. However, the accuracy of ACS determination is often put into question since there exist different types of uncertainties with the signs and symptoms. Belief rule-based expert systems (BRBESs) are widely used to capture uncertain knowledge and to accomplish the task of reasoning under uncertainty by employing belief rule base and evidential reasoning. This article presents the process of developing a BRBES to determine ACS predictability. The BRBES has been validated against the data of 250 patients suffering from chest pain. It is noticed that the outputs created from the BRBES are more dependable than that of the opinion of cardiologists as well as other two expert system tools, namely artificial neural networks and support vector machine. Hence, it can be argued that the BRBES is capable of playing an important role in decision making as well as in avoiding costly laboratory investigations. A procedure to train the system, allowing its enhancement of performance, is also presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hossain et al. (2017) studied Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) suspicion (n=250). Belief Rule-Based Expert System (BRBES) vs. Manual system (cardiologists), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) was evaluated on Accuracy of ACS suspicion prediction (Area Under the ROC Curve) (95% CI 0.950-1.009, p=<0.001). The Belief Rule-Based Expert System (BRBES) accurately predicted acute coronary syndrome suspicion with an AUC of 0.974, outperforming manual assessment by cardiologists, ANN, and SVM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: