Key result
Higher mean arterial pressure is linked to ~32% higher MACE risk per SD, outperforming other blood pressure indices.
Why the study?
Several blood pressure indices are associated with incident cardiovascular disease, but evidence comparing their long-term prognostic value in Asian populations is limited.
Does mean arterial pressure (MAP) provide superior predictive utility for long-term incident cardiovascular disease compared to other blood pressure indices (SBP, DBP, PP) in a Japanese cohort not on antihypertensive therapy?
Cohort (n=163,956)
Yes
Does mean arterial pressure (MAP) provide superior predictive utility for long-term incident cardiovascular disease compared to other blood pressure indices (SBP, DBP, PP) in a Japanese cohort not on antihypertensive therapy?
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is a stronger independent predictor of incident major adverse cardiovascular events over 13 years than systolic, diastolic, or pulse pressure in a predominantly young, healthy Japanese cohort.
MAP may enhance MACE prediction over standard BP indices in untreated adults; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Several blood pressure (BP) indices have been associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, evidence comparing their long-term prognostic value in Asian populations is limited. We investigated the association between multiple BP indices and CVD risk over a 13-year follow-up period in a large Japanese population. Methods: Data from a health check-up program conducted by the Panasonic Corporation covering 166 operational sites from 2008 to 2021, including 163,956 participants not receiving anti-hypertensive drugs, were analyzed. The primary outcome was the incidence of three-point major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, nonfatal coronary artery disease, and nonfatal stroke. Cox proportional hazards models and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to evaluate the associations between the four BP indices (systolic BP [SBP], diastolic BP [DBP], pulse pressure [PP], and mean arterial pressure [MAP]) and incident MACE. Results: After adjusting for confounders, all four BP indices were found to be independently associated with incident MACE. Among them, MAP demonstrated the highest area under the ROC curve for predicting MACE. In the gender-stratified analyses, the findings in males were broadly consistent with the overall results, whereas the predictive advantage of MAP was attenuated in females. Similarly, in analyses restricted to participants aged ≥50 years, the superiority of the MAP was less evident. Conclusions: MAP was the strongest predictor of incident CVD in the Japanese population. These findings underscore the importance of BP phenotyping and suggest that gender and age may modify the utility of MAP in cardiovascular risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ichikawa et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=163,956). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) vs. Systolic BP, Diastolic BP, and Pulse Pressure was evaluated on Incident three-point major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiovascular death, nonfatal coronary artery disease, and nonfatal stroke (HR 1.32 per SD, 95% CI 1.28-1.37, p=<0.001). Mean arterial pressure was independently associated with incident MACE (HR 1.32 per SD) and demonstrated superior predictive ability compared to systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: