Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Eighteenth-century Russian studies in the US has witnessed a number of notable shifts over the past two decades, including a movement away from grand narratives and overdetermined teleologies, the emergence of new areas of concentration, new approaches to old questions, and-most significantly-the collapse of the Russia/West antinome in historiography. This article highlights five vectors in which some of the most original work is currently taking place: the multiplicity of blurred boundaries; the place and practices of religions and confessions (Russian Orthodox as well as others); empire as multi-peopled and as state formation; structures of society and lived experiences; and gender. Within each of them the field has seen a resurgence of source-based empirical research, as well as skepticism toward received wisdoms. There has also been a desire to look beyond the metropole and centers of power and to concentrate on experiences far removed from St.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gary Marker (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 6 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: