This paper reflects on the experience of conducting fieldwork and the gendering of research within the context of a gender repressive state. The Islamic Republic of Iran has consistently enacted discriminatory policies regarding gender relations since 1979. These regressive measures have made the state apprehensive and sensitive towards any research, especially when it is conducted by Iranian feminist scholars with Western institutional affiliations. One of the paradoxical elements of these discriminatory policies has been the increasing access of women to education, in particular to higher education. The main objective of this paper is to unravel dilemmas and obstacles that were encountered when conducting fieldwork within the context of a gender repressive state. The literature on research methodologies has neglected this significant phenomenon, leaving researchers without strategies with which to face and address numerous dilemmas and challenges. The paper discusses several obstacles that I faced in undertaking fieldwork in Iran and the gender relations that were involved and negotiated in the conduct of research. It also describes gender strategies that were used to overcome some of the dilemmas, and problematizes other ethical issues in relation to the production of knowledge, insider/outsider position, the flexibility of the researcher, and the reliability of data particularly as these relate to reflecting on the gendering of the research process. The paper aims thus to generate further discussion about research on gender in the context of a gender repressive state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goli Rezai-Rashti (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: