How we think and feel about sexual risk-taking behavior affects our capacity to treat patients. This paper notes the tendency of the media, clinical research literature, and conventional wisdom to understand sexual risk-taking as characteristic of a damaged “other.” The paper explores how these ideas evolve and how they influence our approach to clinical treatment as well as patients' views of themselves. In marginalizing the risk-taker as a damaged other, anxieties and fears about risk of infection are quelled for patients and clinicians alike. However, when risk-taking behavior is seen as situational, treatment provides a context for inquiry, articulation, and understanding of the patient's unique experiences, feelings, and circumstances. The paper outlines examples of situational factors in clinical work with sexual risk-taking patients. A clinical vignette with a patient highlights how sexual risk-taking emerges in a context of a patient's attempts to assuage or avoid difficult feelings and experiences of self that preclude some, but not all, capacities for self-care. The paper illustrates the psychotherapeutic need to understand the anxieties, fears, hopes, interpersonal contexts, and manners of organizing experiences of self which may supersede self-care during moments of potential high-risk sexual behavior. Rather than seeing sexual risk as an abandonment of self-care, this paper argues that sexual risk-taking behaviors may alternatively reflect intersubjective struggles to care for one's self.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeffre Phillip Cheuvront (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: