PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1990Heart431 citationsOpen Access

Exercise in leisure time: coronary attack and death rates.

JMJ.N. MorrisDCDavid ClaytonMEM G Everitt

Key Result

Habitual vigorous aerobic exercise (reported by 9% of men) was associated with less than half the rate of non-fatal and fatal coronary heart disease compared to other men.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=9,376)

Structured PICO

Does vigorous aerobic exercise in leisure time reduce coronary attack and death rates in middle-aged men with no history of coronary heart disease?

P
Population
9,376 male civil servants, aged 45-64 at entry, with no clinical history of coronary heart disease
I
Intervention
Vigorous sports, considerable amounts of cycling, or fast regular walking (over 4 mph, 6.4 km/h) in leisure time
C
Comparator
Other men not participating in vigorous aerobic exercise
O
Outcome
Non-fatal and fatal coronary heart disease (coronary attack)hard clinical

Habitual, vigorous aerobic exercise in leisure time is associated with a significantly reduced risk of fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in middle-aged men.

Limitations

  • Men who took vigorous aerobic exercise were demonstrably a favourably selected group

Abstract

Nine thousand three hundred and seventy six male civil servants, aged 45-64 at entry, with no clinical history of coronary heart disease, were followed for a mean period of 9 years and 4 months during which 474 experienced a coronary attack. The 9% of men who reported that they often participated in vigorous sports or did considerable amounts of cycling or rated the pace of their regular walking as fast (over 4 mph, 6.4 km/h) experienced less than half the non-fatal and fatal coronary heart disease of the other men. In addition, entrants aged 55-64 who reported the next lower degree of this vigorous aerobic exercise had rates less than two thirds of the remainder; entrants of 45-54 did not show such an effect. When these forms of exercise were not vigorous they were no protection against the disease, nor were other forms of exercise or high totals of physical activity per se. A history of vigorous sports in the past was not protective. Indications in these men are of protection by specific exercise: vigorous, aerobic, with a threshold of intensity for benefit and "dose response" above this threshold, exercise that has to be habitual, and continuing, which suggests that protection is against the acute phases of the disease. Those men who took vigorous aerobic exercise were demonstrably a favourably "selected" group; they suffered less of the disease, however, whether at low risk or high by the several risk factors that were studied. Men with exercise-related reduction in coronary heart disease also had lower death rates from the total of other causes, and so lower total death rates than the rest of the men.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morris et al. (1990) conducted a cohort in No clinical history of coronary heart disease (n=9,376). Vigorous aerobic exercise in leisure time vs. No vigorous aerobic exercise was evaluated on Coronary attack (non-fatal and fatal coronary heart disease). Habitual vigorous aerobic exercise (reported by 9% of men) was associated with less than half the rate of non-fatal and fatal coronary heart disease compared to other men.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09e72e30285ee4a13421b1https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.63.6.325
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper