// Bin Liu 1, 2, 3 , Hao Wu 1 , Deyuan Zhang 4 , Xiaolong Wang 1, 2 , Kuo-Chen Chou 3, 5 1 School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 2 Key Laboratory of Network Oriented Intelligent Computation, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 3 Gordon Life Science Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 4 School of Computer, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China 5 Key Laboratory for Neuro-Information of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China Correspondence to: Bin Liu, email: bliu@gordonlifescience.org , binliu@hitsz.edu.cn Kuo-Chen Chou, email: kcchou@gordonlifescience.org Keywords: sequence analysis, pseudo components, support vector machine, genome/proteome analysis Received: December 02, 2016 Accepted: December 27, 2016 Published: January 05, 2017 ABSTRACT To expedite the pace in conducting genome/proteome analysis, we have developed a Python package called Pse-Analysis. The powerful package can automatically complete the following five procedures: (1) sample feature extraction, (2) optimal parameter selection, (3) model training, (4) cross validation, and (5) evaluating prediction quality. All the work a user needs to do is to input a benchmark dataset along with the query biological sequences concerned. Based on the benchmark dataset, Pse-Analysis will automatically construct an ideal predictor, followed by yielding the predicted results for the submitted query samples. All the aforementioned tedious jobs can be automatically done by the computer. Moreover, the multiprocessing technique was adopted to enhance computational speed by about 6 folds. The Pse-Analysis Python package is freely accessible to the public at http://bioinformatics.hitsz.edu.cn/Pse-Analysis/ , and can be directly run on Windows, Linux, and Unix.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: