The present study aimed to compare five machine learning techniques, namely, artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), classification and regression tree (CART), and random forest (RF) for mass appraisal of real estate. Firstly, 1982 precedent data was collected throughout the entire study area for train and test models. Secondly, a total of 68 variables were considered for the mass appraisal. Subsequently, the five machine learning techniques were applied. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and various statistical methods were applied to compare five machine learning techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilgilioğlu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: