Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Our previous studies demonstrated that a modified accelerated milk replacer (MR) having a 24:20 CP:fat concentration fed at higher feeding rates (FR) resulted in improved growth performance and G:F, but the result was not linear. The objective of the current study was to evaluate preweaning (d 1 to 42) and postweaning (d 43 to 56) calf performance when a modified accelerated MR was fed at greater FR compared with a MR having similar or greater CP and lower fat concentrations. A total of 126 (2 to 5 d old) Holstein heifer calves (40.1 ± 0.76 kg) were blocked by birthdate and randomly assigned to 1 of 5 treatments. Treatments of MR fed at 14.7% solids were (1) control (C−): all milk 24:20 MR fed at 0.26 kg at 2×/d from d 1 to 35; (2) C+: C− MR fed at 0.32 kg 2×/d from d 1 to 35; (3) LF: CP and low fat (24:16) MR fed at 0.32 kg 2×/d from d 1 to 35; (4) LF+: LF MR fed at 0.32 kg 2×/d from d 1 to 7 and at 0.39 kg from d 8 to 35; and (5) HP+: high CP:LF MR (26:16) using the same FR as LF+. All MR were fed 1×/d from d 36 to weaning at d 42 with water and 18% CP texturized calf starter offered free choice at all times. Calves fed C+ had greater (P < 0.05) ADG (0.71, 0.75, 0.70, 0.72, and 0.72 kg/d for C−, C+, LF, LF+, and HP+, respectively) from d 1 to 56 compared with calves fed LF, with other treatments being intermediate. Calves fed C+, LF, and HP+ were similar but taller at the hips (P < 0.05) than calves fed LF+ (98.4, 99.6, 99.8, 98.1, and 99.8 cm), whereas calves fed C+ tended (P < 0.10) to have greater hip widths at 84 d (26.2, 26.5, 26.0, 26.2, 26.4 cm) than calves fed LF. This study demonstrates that feeding a modified accelerated MR (24:20) at a moderate FR improves ADG and frame measurements for calves fed MR having similar or different CP and fat concentrations. The development of a modified accelerated feeding program optimized the protein-to-energy ratio for producing a dairy heifer with a frame that is taller and wider, without having a postweaning BW gain slump.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaeger et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: