Abstract Measuring economic development or economic performance across countries has always been a major task of economic historians.1 The basic problem has been the choice of the yardstick. How can economic performance be measured? Generations of economic historians, when trying to detect the relevant differences in the level of economic development, based their assessment of the relation between advanced countries such as Britain and so-called late-comers such as Germany solely on the then most modern sector or on a combination of modern sectors.2 In principle, this offers a biased viewpoint.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rainer Fremdling (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: