PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 4, 2011African Journal of Agricultural Research149 citationsOpen Access

Silicon application and drought tolerance mechanism of sorghum

View Full Paper
MAMukhtar AhmedFFayyaz-ul-HassenUQUmmara Qadeer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Pot experiments were conducted at the PMAS, Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan during 2007 repeated during 2008 to study the effect of silicon and nanoirrigation (W40) on drought tolerance mechanism of sorghum. According to experimental design, the silicon fertilization was divided into two levels: control (no application of potassium silicate) Si0 and application of silicon Si200 (200 mlL-1 of potassium silicate per kg of soil). Irrigation was divided into two levels: crop upper limit (40 mm) irrigation denoted as W40 and without irrigation, crop lower limit as Wo. Each treatment was replicated three times with two sorghum cultivars: PARC SS-2 (drought tolerant) and Johar-1(drought susceptible). The results showed that increase in silicon leads to increase in leaf area index (LAI), specific leaf weight (SLW), chlorophyll content (SPAD), leaf dry weight (LDW), shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW), total dry weight (TDW) and remarkably decrease in leaf water potential and shoot to root ratio in sorghum cultivars compared to control treatment. When silicon concentration is applied with irrigation LAI, SPAD, LDW, SDW, RDW, TDW, net assimilation rate (NAR), relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area ratio (LAR) and water use efficiency (WUE) increased by 30, 31, 40, 30, 28, 30, 27, 35, 32, 30 and 36% respectively as compared to water deficient treatment. These results suggest that silicon application may be useful to improve the drought tolerance of sorghum through the enhancement of water uptake ability.   Key words: Drought, leaf water potential, leaf area ratio, net assimilation rate, relative growth rate, nano-irrigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahmed et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09f4a1b0d552aa8b45fa56https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar10.626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE, TRANSLOCATION, AND UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT AND CULTIVAR YIELD AND PROTEIN LEVELS1990 · 154 citations
  2. 2Effects of silicon on salinity tolerance of two barley cultivars1996 · 239 citations
  3. 3The Effect of a Drying Top Soil and a Possible Non-hydraulic Root Signal on Wheat Growth and Yield1991 · 56 citations
  4. 4Growth and Gas Exchange of Three Sorghum Cultivars Under Drought Stress2003 · 54 citations
  5. 5Phosphorus Nutrition and Water Stress Effects on Proline Accumulation in Sorghum and Bean*1996 · 66 citations