Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of post ruminal methionine, dietary methionine or dietary sulfur (S) supplementation on nitrogen retention and S excretion was determined by using three Holstein steers fitted with abomasal cannula in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. The basal diet was fed ad libitum and consisted of ground timothy hay and concentrate in a 5:1 ratio. The diet contained 12% crude protein with urea contributing about 40% of the total nitrogen. Elemental S (0.05%) or methionine (0.22%) was added to the diet while a similar quantity of methionine was infused into the abomasum. Abomasal infused methionine compared with supplemental dietary S or methionine resulted in a 16.6 and 23.9% increase in percent of absorbed nitrogen retained, which was not statistically significant (probability approximately 0.25). Sulfur intake and apparent S digestibility was similar for all treatments; however, urinary S concentration tended to be lower for the elemental S treatment (probability approximately 0.10). Sulfur retention was higher (P < 0.05) with supplementary elemental S than when a similar amount of S was consumed or infused in the form of methionine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steinacker et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: